August 2025
As employers across the country embrace the use of artificial intelligence in their workplace activities, federal and state lawmakers are lining up to consider guardrails on common AI practices. From hiring to performance management, from resume review to video interviews, AI is increasingly relied upon by employers to help with a wide spectrum of tasks – and lawmakers are taking notice. Their race to regulate has a particular impact on PEOs and their vendors.
This article will review some of the key workplace-related AI laws that are either slated to take effect or are being considered on Capitol Hill and in statehouses around the country.
Federal lawmakers failed to pass a law that would have prevented states from implementing their own AI rules for the next 10 years (or blocked them from collecting billions in federal funding for five years). But that doesn’t mean Congress is sitting idly by. It is also considering a bipartisan proposal to create whistleblower protections for employees who report risks or misuse of AI tools in the workplace. The proposed law would cover retaliation claims and encourage internal reporting mechanisms.
Three big things are brewing in California:
Colorado’s SB 205 is slated to create the most detailed AI regulatory scheme in the country, imposing significant obligations on businesses using “high-risk” AI systems, including employment-related tools. Starting in 2026, employers will be required to conduct impact assessments, disclose AI use to individuals, and take steps to mitigate discrimination. But rumblings persist from state leaders that the law may be delayed or watered down prior to the February 1, 2026, effective date.
Under the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, employers using AI to analyze video interviews must notify candidates, obtain consent, and share how the technology works. Noncompliance could lead to lawsuits or enforcement actions.
SB 5668 (The RAISE Act) would require developers of advanced AI systems to implement safety protocols and disclose testing documentation. Lawmakers passed the bill in June, and it still awaits action from Governor Hochul – who is hearing concerns from tech leaders about the potential negative impacts it could have on the state if adopted.
NYC’s Local Law 144 – the first local AI law in the country to regulate the workplace – has been requiring employers using automated employment decision tools (AEDTs) to conduct annual bias audits and notify candidates and employees about their use since 2023.
Texas surprised everybody when it enacted a law requiring a detailed study of AI’s impact on jobs, bias, and transparency – but the pending law (set to take effect in 2026) presents few if any regulatory challenges for employers.
The emerging landscape of AI legislation demands a proactive and comprehensive approach from PEOs. As laws evolve, particularly with significant developments expected in states like California, Illinois, and New York, PEOs must ensure their clients and their own operations have robust policies and practices for workplace complaints and investigations, especially those involving AI-driven decisions. Savvy PEOs will also work closely with vendors to limit liability arising from third-party products utilized by the PEO.
SHARE