PEOS MUST PROCEED WITH CAUTION WITH EMPLOYEE RETENTION CREDIT

BY Matt Hunter, ESQ.

Senior Associate
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav LLP

BY Don Sniezek

Senior Technical Advisor
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav LLP

February 2025

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress enacted the Employee Retention Credit (ERC), to help taxpayer businesses weather the storm. But despite the genuine benefit that ERC provides to qualifying businesses, the IRS has been faced with many fraudulent and questionable claims.

As a result, the Service has initiated aggressive enforcement actions centered on this credit.

The wave of IRS audits, inquiries and assessments has spurred concern for taxpayers across the country and has even resulted in firms selling ERC insurance. Importantly, several Professional Employer Organizations (PEOs) have found themselves in a precarious situation (beyond ERC processing times) as IRS audits have started to hit their clients.

PEOs file ERC on behalf of their clients. Typically, these PEOs file Form 941s in aggregate under its own Employee Identification Number (EIN). These filings should include a Schedule R that describes aggregated wages and credits claimed for each of the PEOs clients.

As PEOs claimed ERC on behalf of their pool of clients, several issues of liability began to come into question. For example, the IRS stated in 2023 that it has the authority to satisfy a PEO’s tax liability with amounts of the PEO clients’ ERC claims.

Now, another concern has come into play. This issue rears its head when the IRS audits a PEO’s client (or client base) and finds ineligible ERCs. In this case, the IRS has made its stance clear: the PEO is jointly on the hook with its clients’ for ERC liabilities.

Although there is disagreement in terms of whether or not PEOs are liable for their clients’ claims, and the issue likely will continue to play out before the agency and in the courts, the IRS made its position clear in Chief Counsel Memorandum 2024-001.

According to the Service, when “improperly claimed credits are claimed by a PEO for its client, and the credit claim is based on the wages paid by the PEO to the client’s employees and reported on the PEO’s employment tax return, both the PEO and its client are liable for any underpayment of tax resulting from the improperly claimed credits.”

This burden has put certain PEOs, who simply cannot afford the liability for their client base in total, in a quandary.

The truth is that, for PEOs who already find themselves on the hook for an ERC liability, options might be limited. The IRS opened a supplemental claim process, offering a way for PEOs to exclude improper client claims or correct miscalculated claims, and the deadline for filing this supplemental closed on December 31, 2024.

PEOs who find themselves faced with an ERC audit should immediately seek out tax counsel to help navigate their path forward.

The reality now is that the IRS has begun to roll out ERC audits in full force as the agency has issued several rounds of tax credit denials while identifying more and more areas of high risk.

However, for those PEOs who have submitted ERC claims on behalf of their clients and are not in the midst of an IRS audit, the path forward should be tread lightly.

First, if a PEO has not yet submitted what would at this point be an amended ERC claim, it is imperative that the firm have their CPA, or a reputable firm specializing in the credit, review the underlying ERC claims for accuracy. There is still a short but open window to file a supplemental claim and correct the ERC errors.

This review should verify that the ERC claims have each been calculated correctly and that they can be substantiated should the IRS initiate an audit. Doing this sort of analysis will inevitably minimize the time and expense of dealing with a potential IRS audit down the line.

However, if a PEO firm has already claimed the ERC on behalf of its clients, it should without a doubt still conduct an extensive review of the claims before paying out credit monies received to its clients.

The statute of limitations for the final eligibility quarters for ERC, Q3 and Q4 of 2021, isn’t until April 15, 2027. The tax credit is incredibly valuable and PEOs shouldn’t shy away from claiming it. But they must do so with a critical eye and evaluate positions taken

The IRS has made clear that the number of its ERC audits will continue to grow. And again, PEO firms could very well be liable should these audits impact their clients. PEOs should take this notion to heart and conduct a thorough risk assessment to ensure they are compliant with ERC requirements.

Organizations such as NAPEO continue to work diligently on behalf of the industry when it comes to challenges surrounding ERC, and while these issues continue to play out PEOs should proactively assess their tax situation. If imposed, the ERC liability at issue will not go away. And failing to address the situation head on could be costly.

 

This article is designed to give general and timely information about the subjects covered. It is not intended as legal advice or assistance with individual problems. Readers should consult competent counsel of their own choosing about how the matters relate to their own affairs. Want to learn more about the ERTC and view NAPEO resources on the issue? Visit this page

SHARE


RELATED ARTICLES

LEGAL - LEGISLATIVE

MEET CONGRESSWOMAN ERIN HOUCHIN

Voters in Indiana’s 9th Congressional district elected Congresswoman Erin Houchin to serve in the United States House of Representatives in November 2022. In doing so, Rep. Houchin became the first woman elected to Congress from her district. She also holds the distinction of being the only person elected to Congress who has worked for a PEO.Rep. Houchin spoke to PEO Insider about her decision to seek public office, her experience working for a PEO, and the policies she champions.

BY Chris Chaney

May 2023
LEGAL - LEGISLATIVE

NAPEO ADVOCACY DAY IS A HOME RUN

There's an energy around the PEO industry this year that's palpable. Nowhere is that more true than in Washington DC, where we are starting to make our mark as a strong contributor to the vitality and success of the backbone of the economy: small and mid-size businesses. We've got a great story to tell. Help us tell it.

BY THOM STOHLER

August 2023

THINK IT THROUGH: HOW RETURN-TO-OFFICE MANDATES MAY IMPACT EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

As a result of the workforce evolution in recent years, remote, hybrid and onsite work has been redefined, and is a top-of-mind subject in daily conversations. Many companies and teams like ours at LandrumHR have an employee base geographically widespread throughout the U.S. In our case, this pre-dates the pandemic, but like these other companies we, too, are still evaluating the pros and cons to re-engaging teams physically onsite where and when possible, without causing disruption to workflow and requiring facilities (re)construct.

BY Gehan "G" Haridy-Ardanowski

February 2023

STAY INFORMED: RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS MAY IMPACT EMPLOYERS’ USE OF ARBITRATION IN EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS

Use of arbitration and class-action waiver agreements allows for the private resolution of employment claims on an individual basis. While arbitration is not a low-cost alternative, it can be a very strong hedge against runaway jury awards and swollen class-action damages.  

BY STEPHEN CALVERT, ESQ.

May 2023

ADVERTISEMENT

Ad for Sentara Health Plans