NAPEO
In May 2022, NCCI issued their Annual State of the Line report which hit on key workers’ compensation metrics and trends impacting the industry. There can be no underestimating the positive results. With an 87% combined ratio, 2021 marked the eighth consecutive year of record underwriting gains.
Whether it be the pandemic, the Great Resignation, or sweeping social and regulatory changes, there can be no denying that insurers and employers alike are going through a significant cultural change that hasn’t been seen since the passing of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
If you read any newspaper, watch any news program, or listen to any business podcasts it’s impossible to avoid discussions of surging gas prices, record inflation, labor shortages, supply chain bottlenecks, and—scariest of all—signs of a looming recession.External influences like these economic forces are part of any business cycle. You can’t out-grow, out-innovate, or out-think market forces. However, how you respond to such influences can be determinative in how well you fare through challenging economic cycles.
While walking one day, I ran into a neighbor doing yard work. We hadn’t spoken much before, but upon striking up conversation I soon learned of his love of woodworking. His excitement led him to take me on a tour of his basement, where I saw all manner of intricate saws and Depression-era tools, along with beautiful pieces of furniture. The neighbor was giddy as he showed what was clearly one of the great joys in his life. Similarly, as an actuary, “finding the right number” is one my great joys. Best yet, this topic is applicable to all industries and coverages. So, how does an actuary find the right number?
While workplace violence incidents may not have dominated the news cycle during COVID, incidents of workplace violence have increased over the past three years. According to one recent survey conducted by a major insurance carrier, 34 percent of small and mid-sized businesses experienced at least one employee threat or violent incident. This article examines some of the fundamental causes of workplace violence and the unique value PEOs can bring to their clients in addressing workplace violence and workplace culture issues.
This article presents excerpts from NAPEO’s 2019 paper, “Best Practices for Reducing the Risk Associated with PEO Payroll Fraud.” These days, it’s not unusual to read or hear stories in the news about fraud occurring within businesses. Many times, these businesses are victimized when an individual in a position of financial authority makes unauthorized withdrawals or disbursements from bank accounts or misdirects cash deposits. Generally, the response to these is to put controls in place to prevent and detect fraud relating to cash, but the possibility of payroll fraud is often overlooked. The PEO industry has a high risk for the potential of payroll fraud. We must be ever-vigilant about the various schemes that fraudsters put into play to cheat PEOs out of their hard-earned cash, including through automated clearing house (ACH) fraud, check fraud, and identity theft.
One of the trends over the last 12 to 24 months has been the hardening employment practices liability insurance (EPLI) market. Companies that may be accustomed to focusing on workers’ compensation risks are seeing large EPLI rate increases, rising retentions, or both. The goal of this article is to discuss ways companies can potentially mitigate these rising insurance costs. But first, it is helpful to understand what EPLI is and isn’t, then discuss market trends, and finally cover potential actions to take.
Cyber insurance coverage and underwriting have changed a lot since the first cyber insurance policy was sold in 1997, especially in the last two years. Cyber insurance didn’t really take off with business owners until around 2014, when cyberattacks became more frequent and primarily involved stealing personal and private information of businesses’ employees and customers. When stolen personal information resulted in identity theft, businesses faced financial liability as they found themselves being responsible for the restoration of the identities. Businesses performed restoration either voluntarily or after lawsuits were filed. These businesses also found themselves paying for credit watches for all of the individuals whose information had been stolen.
As the industry has grown over the years, PEOs have evolved naturally in the direction of multi-state operations. This has always been true, but the pace or scope of this effect accelerated with the rise of remote work during the pandemic. The PEO client service agreement (CSA) is a challenging document. The complexities and ambiguities of the PEO arrangement require a lengthy contract to reasonably address the risks and to protect the PEO. These challenges are magnified by the need to address state-by-state issues.
The term “carve-out” is commonly used in the industry, but how it works may not be quite as clear. For those who are not familiar with the term, it describes an arrangement in which the onsite client secures its own direct workers’ compensation coverage for its workforce. Because that client has contracted to be in a PEO arrangement, the co-employees performing services for that client are covered under the client’s own workers’ compensation insurance policy, not the PEO’s policy. Typically, that coverage is sufficient and no other problems arise.
The success of any organization lies in its ability to adapt and grow profitably. Without being able to shift focus and direction, a company can lose its edge, then its market share. Ultimately, it will no longer be viable in the marketplace. Sears, Kmart, and Blockbuster will forever be remembered—not for their greatness for decades, but for their unwillingness to see the changes in the marketplace and adapt.
Multi-state expansion for most PEOs can be planned or unplanned. This article will provide insight for small and middle market PEOs that are dealing with the operational aspects of multi-state expansion due to one-off employee hirings by clients in states where they are not currently licensed or registered.
As employers begin transitioning away from pandemic mode and toward management mode, they also are trying to navigate the changes to the legal landscape governing the workplace. The government has made this all the more difficult with its ever-shifting rules designed to both address the pandemic and reflect the changes in philosophy in transitioning from the Trump to the Biden administrations. Below are just a few of the recent changes that PEOs should be aware of to better service their clients.
Investors interested in the PEO industry commonly want an overview of the risks facing PEOs. While it is impossible to cover every material risk for every possible transaction in 1,000 words, we accept the challenge and will attempt to cover common risk themes as in-depth as possible.
At the end of 2020, management consulting firm McKinsey & Company surveyed 899 C-suite executives about the impacts of the pandemic on business operations. One of their conclusions was that the pandemic had accelerated the adoption of digital processes by three to seven years, with B2B firms like those in the PEO space on the higher end of the spectrum.
